Direct link to latest edition of Pool 32 Mag - click on this image

What is Pool 32 Mag all about ?

Pool 32 Mag is a new fly fishing e-magazine for everyone who loves fly fishing, and wish to follow environmental issues as well.

The best part is that it's a totally FREE e-mag and it can be downloaded by anyone, anywhere on the planet.

Check it out, sign up or send it on to a friend who is just as crazy about fly fishing as we are.


If you chose to scroll further down you will find the Pool 32 Blog

"our cyber world of fishy stuff".


We HATE spam mails, so we will of course

handle your mail info's according to our very strict privacy policy.


Copyright © Mark Wengler

No photo reproduction of any kind without prior written


"Fly fishing isn't just a sport - it's a state of mind!!"

Check out earlier issues of Pol 32 mag


January 8, 2012

Fierce fish farm opponent - Don Staniford.


I have to add that I really respect Don Staniford - simply because he is one of the few persons who have made fighting for a really important cause a way of life, something we all could learn a lot from.

Here is an article from Yahoo News describing his situation right now where he is facing a huge lawsuit from the Norwegian fish farm industry.


Fierce fish farm opponent remains defiant in the face of B.C. defamation case

By Keven Drews, The Canadian Press 


VANCOUVER - Don Staniford says he's never had a fist fight — not even during his most ferocious action as a rugby player in high school or as a soccer player at university in the United Kingdom.

Change the subject to B.C.'s salmon farming industry, though, and the British-born activist with long, curly hair is more than willing to take on the world's largest salmon-farming companies in the ring of public opinion.

His outspoken criticism has earned him an appearance at the Supreme Court of B.C. on Jan. 16 where he must defend himself against allegations from Mainstream Canada, the province's second largest salmon farming company, that he defamed the organization.

The case could cost him $125,000 if he loses.
The defamation case is the second Staniford has faced in the province since 2005 and the third major legal fight of his 18-year international campaigning career.
"It's definitely a stressful situation," said Staniford, who is a native of Merseyside, England, near Liverpool.
"It's obviously gearing up for a fight. It's not a physical fight but it's a mental fight."
According to court documents, the case focuses on anti-salmon farming campaigns Staniford initiated on or about Jan. 31, 2011.
In those documents, Mainstream Canada's lawyer David Wotherspoon alleges Staniford disseminated and published defamatory and false statements about the company under three titles: "The Salmon Farming Kills Campaign", the "Silent Spring of the Sea," and "Smoke on the Water, Cancer on the Coast."
The company's amended notice of civil claim includes published graphics that look like cigarette packages and include warnings like "Salmon Farming Kills Like Smoking."
The company argues Staniford also wants to frustrate the World Wildlife Fund's pending certification scheme for farmed salmon.
The documents state that when the company's lawyers demanded Staniford cease and desist and retract his comments publicly, Staniford responded one minute past the deadline and with another cigarette-like-package graphic that read "Norwegian Owned" and included an image of a raised middle finger and the words "Salmon Farming."
Mainstream Canada produces 25,000 tonnes of fish in B.C. every year and is a subsidiary of the Norwegian company Cermaq.
"These statements that Staniford has used are styled after those kind of health warnings as though the salmon farming industry and farmed salmon is so dangerous that they require a health warning and is going to make people sick ... That's what this case is about," Wotherspoon said in an interview with The Canadian Press.
The company's trial brief states it's seeking $100,000 in general damages, $25,000 in punitive damages and a permanent injunction to stop Staniford from writing, printing or broadcasting defamatory words against Mainstream.
Staniford said he won't back down and settle the case, no matter the costs.
He's going up against a formidable opponent.
Mainstream Canada, which is headquartered in Oslo, Norway, also operates in Chile, Canada, Scotland and Vietnam. The Norwegian government is a majority shareholder, said a company official, and its legal counsel is Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, which is, according to its own website, the "third largest Canadian-based law firm."
At trial, the company plans to call 10 witnesses, including Lise Bergen, it's parent company's director of corporate affairs in Norway, Ruth Salmon, executive director of the Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance, and the executive director of the B.C. Salmon Farmers Association.
In contrast, Staniford said he is not currently employed and is being represented by Vancouver-based lawyer David Sutherland, who runs a two-person law firm.
Court documents state Staniford plans to call one expert witness — John Volpe, an associate professor at the University of Victoria — and "possibly others."
Staniford himself is a seasoned international campaigner not unfamiliar with court action and has said he earned an undergraduate degree in geography in Birmingham, England and a master's degree in environmental science from Lancaster University.
He said he became interested in the aquaculture debate while completing his degrees and then volunteered with the environmental group, Friends of the Earth Scotland. In 1997, he met the well-known B.C. anti-salmon farming activist Alexandra Morton at a conference in Seattle, Wash.
Staniford said he faced his first legal threat in 2001 from a Scottish salmon farming company, but no trial ever took place.
In 2002, he began working for the Salmon Farm Protest Group and won a British Environment and Media Award.
According to an Oct. 24, 2002 press release on the World Wildlife Federation website, Staniford "was a significant influence in persuading the Scottish Parliament to hold a formal inquiry into fish farming, has written a widely praised Friends of the Earth critique of fish farming in Scotland and uncovered proof that fish farm workers were being ordered to use illegal chemicals."
Staniford came to Canada in 2004 and in 2005 he took a job with the Tofino, B.C. environmental group, Friends of Clayoquot Sound.
In June of that year he issued two news releases that questioned Tofino's Creative Salmon Company Ltd.'s use of malachite green, an antibiotic and suspected carcinogen, on market fish.
Creative Salmon sued Staniford for defamation, and in January 2007, a Supreme Court of B.C. judge ordered him to pay $85,000 in damages in legal fees. But Staniford appealed and won a new trial. Then, the Supreme Court of Canada said it would not hear a subsequent appeal by the company.
At one point during the 2010 Winter Olympics, Staniford said he even tried to deliver a letter to the king of Norway during a hockey match in Vancouver.
When asked what motivated him to become an environmental activist, Staniford said he wasn't sure.
"It wasn't my parents," he said. "I don't know where it came from. I think it came from the gut somewhere."
But he added the matter comes down to his principles.
"I think there's a moral imperative and a duty, once you have that knowledge about salmon farming and its impact, to spread the message," he said.
"I think the onus is on researchers to be political, to be active and not just let that information rot on an academic bookshelf but to get that into the media and that really means being a campaigner."
Staniford said he has received financial support from West Coast Environmental Law, as well as citizens in Canada, the U.S. and Europe.
Among his fans is journalist, writer and angler Bruce Sandison, who was an angling correspondent for The Scotsman newspaper for 20 years and worked with Staniford in 2002.
He called Staniford's work ethic "quite extraordinary" and said the protester helped organize actions at supermarkets in Belfast, Edinburgh and London.
"One of Don's greatest abilities is the determination to ... research things," he said in a telephone interview from Scotland. "He seemed to be able to have the ability to put together a massive technical detail and make sense of it. He was very good and very committed."
But Laurie Jensen, a Mainstream Canada spokeswoman, said company and industry employees have come under personal attack from Staniford who has gone beyond "rational dialogue."
"He's crossed the line and he's done the same thing with accusing us that our product causes cancer," she said.
When asked if she agrees the court battle is a David and Goliath struggle, Jensen said the company is playing the role of David.
"I think we're on the righteous end of things in that we have to defend ourselves," she said. "If we don't, we do a disservice to our communities, our partners, our employees."
Mary Ellen Walling, executive director of the B.C. Salmon Farmers Association, said Staniford has made personal attacks on her and those attacks are hard to call "a respectful kind of dialogue."
"He doesn't seem to be interested in any kind of exchange of information," she said, adding that her association isn't funding any of the court action but wants to support people working in the industry.
Staniford remains defiant, standing behind his statements and his objective of shutting down the B.C. industry.
If he loses the court action, he said the company will find collecting the damages "like getting blood out of a stone."
"I am going to fight until the bitter end and win," he added.

STOP SHARK FINNING - NOW!!!

STOP SHARK FINNING - NOW!!!

Watch this terrible movie and help us stop this insane madness!!

What kind of race are we humans - In my perspective we are a just f--ked up and very primitive, greedy and without any kind of empathy for other spices on this magnificent planet we are so privileged to be living on..... so sad, so very very sad to watch......




January 6, 2012

137 Species Rely on Pacific Salmon


Source: Salmon Nation - hosted by Ecotrust



137 Species Rely on Pacific Salmon¨


By Ed Hunt


In evolutionary terms, it seems counterproductive. Wouldn't it be better if each fish lived to rear its young, and perhaps even get a second shot at spawning?
It turns out that Pacific Salmon, in their own way, are providing for their offspring. When salmon swim upstream, they are returning to the waters where they themselves hatched years before — their bodies plump with eggs as well as the bounty of the seas.
After spawning, they leave their nutrient-rich carcasses behind. Many of the microscopic creatures that nibble on the carcasses eventually become prey for the next generation of fish. And so the parents nourish the young.
But salmon provide more than an indirect food source for baby salmon. At least 137 different species — from grizzly bears to gray wolves — depend on salmon for part of their diet. Even trees and plants benefit from the nutrients brought back by salmon from the seas.
It is awe-inspiring when you think about it. This mighty fish struggles up stream, jumping waterfalls, and its last act is sacrificing its body to ensure that the community that will raise its children will be thriving, teeming with life.
Which begs the question, what are we doing for our community, for the next generation?
Imagine what could be accomplished if we devoted our energies to the future the way that salmon do. Imagine if you will, a Nation of such salmon-people, leaping great obstacles to make a better place for their offspring and their ecosystem.

                                                            Get the poster! Featuring the fun artwork of Shannon Wheeler, 
and the above essay.Download here [1.4 mb]




New Winter 2012 Patagonia e-mag out now


The latest edition of the Patagonia e-mag is out now - check it out HERE

January 4, 2012

Biotech Firms Caught In Regulatory No Man's Land

Source to this article: NPR website


Biotech Firms Caught In Regulatory No Man's Land



by 



Companies making genetically modified animals face a regulatory morass in this country. It's not always clear which federal agency has responsibility for regulating a particular animal, and even when one agency does take the lead, the approval process can drag on for years.
The companies say this uncertainty means their technologies may die without ever being given a chance.
Take the case of the British company Oxitec. It has developed a genetically modified mosquito that the company says can be used to combat a disease called dengue.
Dengue is potentially fatal, and there is no treatment or vaccine. Dengue is not common in the United States, but it could be, because we have plenty of the species of mosquito that transmits it. There have been sporadic cases in Texas and Florida, so controlling this mosquito is crucial for keeping dengue out of the United States.
Luke Alphey, chief scientific officer of Oxitec, says the basic idea is very simple. The company has made genetically modified male mosquitoes that are sterile. When these modified males mate with normal females, there are no offspring.
"Over time, with periodic releases or successive releases of these sterile males, the target population will collapse," says Alphey.
No mosquitoes, no dengue.
Florida officials agreed to let Oxitec test its mosquitoes in Key West. So in 2009, Oxitec started asking which federal agency it needed to get approval from. The U.S. Department of Agriculture said, 'We're it,' so in March 2010, Oxitec submitted an application to import its mosquitoes from the U.K., and waited to hear back. And waited.
Finally, 18 months later, Oxitec heard back from the USDA. Bad news. The agency said, "We're not the right agency. Try the Food and Drug Administration."
How is it possible that it takes a federal agency 18 months to decide it's not the right one to regulate something?
"Well, the basic issue goes back to the problem of how the government first established oversight over genetically modified organisms," says Eric Hallerman, a professor of fisheries and wildlife at Virginia Tech. "There is no particular act that establishes government authority to do it."
Instead, in 1986 the Reagan White House decided to use existing laws, such as the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as the basis of regulating genetically modified organisms. This has led to some strange circumstances. For example, for the purpose of regulation, the FDA considers a genetically modified mosquito to be a new animal drug.
But if Oxitec is frustrated, consider the plight of a Massachusetts company called AquaBounty. It has created a genetically modified salmon, a fish that is also a drug as far as the FDA is concerned. The salmon grows faster than wild salmon, something that could appeal to fish farmers.
AquaBounty has been trying to get FDA approval to market its salmon for more than a decade.
Hallerman was on a panel of scientists the FDA asked to evaluate whether the AquaBounty salmon were safe. In September 2010, the panel met and told the FDA yes, it would be OK to approve the salmon for sale.
"I was thinking at that time that they were going to come out with some sort of a decision sometime that winter," says Hallerman. "Well, here we are at the next winter."
The point here isn't whether AquaBounty's salmon or Oxitec's mosquitoes really are safe — there are some legitimate scientific questions about that. The point is that the companies are in a regulatory never-never land.
"It's sending a very strong message to the investment community and to people trying to develop innovative new products that there really is not a functional regulatory paradigm," says Ron Stotish, president of AquaBounty. Stotish says any answer would be better than none at all.
But even if the FDA does approve the salmon, there's yet another hurdle. Mark Begich, the Democratic senator from Alaska, isn't convinced the salmon is safe, and he says that approving it would threaten his state's wild salmon fisheries.
"We don't need to go down this path, and I believe that's a position we need to take," says Begich.
He has introduced legislation that would make it unlawful to ship, transport, offer for sale, sell or purchase genetically altered salmon or other marine fish.
If such a piece of legislation became law, it would, if nothing else, lighten FDA's workload.

Listen to this story by using the NPR media player underneath 

January 3, 2012

Online news is reporting that 12 salmon cages have broken loose


Check out this article from Forargyll
PS. don't forget to read the updates via this link


Online news is reporting that 12 salmon 
cages have broken loose.

BBC Orkney and Shetland online news is reporting that 12 salmon cages have broken loose from a fish farm and are adrift off Unst. Each is nearly 100 ft in diameter and full of mature fish. They were originally attached to each other, forming a linked circle but the connections have progressively been breaking up.
The report does not give the number of fish but Ewan Kennedy of the saveseilsound campaign says the maximum permitted by the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) is  2,500 tonnes which, at 4kg per fish would mean 600,000 salmon.
As well as the danger to shipping of 12 of these drifting cages – and the wind direction today will take them towards Norway, this is also an environmental hazard. This scale of break out carries immense risks for wild salmon stocks in their mating with farmed fish.
The BBC report indicates that local thinking is that the cages went adrift on Christmas Eve – they are off the south coast of Unst. It is thought unlikely that the salmon will still be in the cages – an expensive festive lapse of concentration.
According to the report, the owners of the farm, Lakeland Unst Ltd,  have been ‘urged to tow them to shore’ – a curios expression that suggests inaction to date on the part of the fish farm management. Local boats and boats in the area have been asked to help.
As yet, the local BBC report on this for Orkney and Shetland has not been noted in the main BBC Scotland webpage notr as far as we aware, has it been mentioned on BBC Scotland. (Update 11.50 2nd January, this item has still not been carried on the BBC’s online Scotland main page – very poor news judgement allied to holiday eyes-off-the-ball.)
We reported the incident to SEPA, who did not know of it and they are keeping us in touch on the issue, particularly in response to questions we have put to them.
The matter also relates to the decision to hand over responsibility for emergency towing from the Coastguard to the oil and gas industry in the spring of this year, removing altogether the two large ETVs which were temporarily reprieved by robust campaigning, following the decision to axe them as a contribution to spending cuts.
As has been noted in Arran’s COAST, had an incident like this happened in The Minch the consequences would have been catastrophic. The nature of hazard these cages present to shipping is such that they would not normally cause a sinking but they could stop a ship. Without emergency towing capacity, the consequences of such a disablement would depend on what the affected ship was carrying and at what strength and in which direction the wind was blowing.
Shipping and the local marine environment in The Minch would be helplessly prey to chance in such a scenario. 

This article from Mail Online really caught my eye


This article from Mail Online really caught my eye, really strange but then again if I think about what we humans are doing to our beautiful blue planet, then I'm not that surprised - I'm just sad that my daughter are growing up in a world full of chaos and huge environmental issues

What made 20 TONNES of fish wash up on Norwegian beach?

Thousands of dead herring have been discovered washed up on a north Norwegian beach - prompting Doomsday predictors to hail it as another sign the world is set to end.

More than 20 tonnes of the fish is currently carpeting the beach of Kvaenes, in Nordreisa, with experts views differing on how they have come to be there. One thing is for sure, it will provide welcome ammunition to those believing the Mayan prophecy that 2012 will bring the end of Earth.




Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2081346/Mystery-20-TONNES-fish-wash-Kvaenes-beach-Norway.html#ixzz1iO59Opz1

January 2, 2012

Check out these great online catalogs from Patagonia

Check out these great online catalogs from Patagonia

You will find the latest November /December edition by clicking HERE.


....and past issues by clicking HERE



January 1, 2012

Percy Assarsson passed away during the Christmas holidays



I have just learned that Percy Assarsson passed away during the Christmas holidays and I was very sad to hear this.
Percy have worked at Morrum most of his life, started when he was only 19 years old and in 2005 he became the chief executive. Through all these years Percy have done a great job in taking care of our beloved Morrum river. Sadly Percy passed away only 49 years old. He will be remembered.

Our thoughts and condolences goes to his dear family in this difficult moment.